Catastrophic Risks
نویسنده
چکیده
Catastrophic risks are rare events with major consequences, e.g. catastrophic climate change or extinction of a species. The article summarizes decision theory involving catastrophic risks within Von Neumanns axiomatic theory of choice under uncertainty, and within new extensions of the theory that are speci cally designed for rare events of major consequences. The classic expected utility theory is insensitive to rare events no matter how catastrophic. Its insensitivity emerges from the requirement of nearby responses to nearby stimuli, where nearbyis de ned in terms of averages. Thus Arrows Monotone Continuity Axiom and its relatives in Hernstein and Milnor anticipate average responses to extreme events. This leads to expected utilitythat is insensitive to extreme risks. In a new axiomatic extension the author (Chichilnisky 1996, 2000, 2002) allowes extreme responses to extreme events, and requires equal treatement of rare and frequent events, deriving the new decision criterion the axioms imply. These are expected utility combined with purely nitely addditive measures that focus on catastrophes, and reproduce "fat tails" distributions. Continuity is based on the topology of fearintroduced in Chichilnisky (2009), and is linked to De Groots axioms in the foundation of statistics and Debreus 1953 work on Adam Smiths Invisible The results of this article were presented at Greqam Universite de Marseille, December 18th 2008, at LAMETA Universite de Montpellier, December 19th and 20th 2008, at the NBER-NSF General Equilibrium Conference in Honor of Gerard Debreu, October 6 2006, at the Statistics Department of Columbia University October 11 2006, at the Fields Institute for Mathematical Research Conference on Catastrohpic Risks, 1996, Toronto Canada, and at a Sta¤ Seminar of NHH, University of Oslo Norway March 21 2007. 1 UNEDITED VERSION. The final version is to appear in the International Journal of Green Economics, 2009
منابع مشابه
Should catastrophic risks be included in a regulated competitive health insurance market?
In 1988 the Dutch government launched a proposal for a national health insurance based on regulated competition. The mandatory benefits package should be offered by competing insurers and should cover both non-catastrophic risks (like hospital care, physician services and drugs) and catastrophic risks (like several forms of expensive long-term care). However, there are two arguments to exclude ...
متن کاملOmohundro’s “Basic AI Drives” and Catastrophic Risks
Shulman, Carl. 2010. Omohundro's " Basic AI Drives " and Catastrophic Risks.
متن کاملThe Most Extreme Risks: Global Catastrophes
The most extreme risk are those that threaten the entirety of human civilization, known as global catastrophic risks. The very extreme nature of global catastrophes makes them both challenging to analyze and important to address. They are challenging to analyze because they are largely unprecedented and because they involve the entire global human system. They are important to address because t...
متن کاملAddressing Catastrophic Risks: Disparate Anatomies Require Tailored Therapies
Catastrophic risks differ in terms of their natural or human origins, their possible amplification by human behaviors, and the relationships between those who create the risks and those who suffer the losses. Given their disparate anatomies, catastrophic risks generally require tailored therapies, with each prescribed therapy employing a specific portfolio of policy strategies. Given that catas...
متن کاملAsteroids: Assessing Catastrophic Risks
We evaluate two risk profiles: i global warming risks and ii collisions with asteroids that can cause the extinction of our species. The expected values computed for these two risks suggest that no action will be taken to avoid extinction. The result is somewhat counterintuitive, but it is typical of the results of using classic decision theory to evaluate catastrophic risks in the distant futu...
متن کاملExpected Utility Theory and the Tyranny of Catastrophic Risks
Expected Utility theory is not only applied to individual choices but also to ethical decisions, e.g. in cost-benefit analysis of climate change policy measures that affect future generations. In this context the crucial question arises whether EU theory is able to deal with ”catastrophic risks”, i.e. risks of high, but very unlikely losses, in an ethically appealing way. In this paper we show ...
متن کامل